Geo-location in a wireless communication network

ABSTRACT

A method for geo-location of a wireless communication unit ( 410 ) is provided. The communication unit ( 410 ) communicates with a wireless communication network ( 430 ) of a wireless communication system ( 400 ). A probability density function is derived for the location of the wireless communication unit ( 410 ), from measured information and/or information about the wireless communication network ( 430 ). The probability density function is sampled to provide spatial and probability information about each of at least two possible locations for the wireless communication unit ( 410 ). A wireless communication system ( 400 ) and a method of selecting enhancements to a wireless communication system ( 400 ) are also provided.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to U.S.Provisional Application No. 61/144,242, filed Jan. 13, 2009, the entiredisclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

Aspects of the invention relate to the geo-location of wirelesscommunication units, and the planning of wireless networks.

The invention is applicable to mobile telephones. The invention is alsoapplicable to other types of wireless digital communication units,including both personal digital assistants (PDAs) and laptop computerswith wireless communications capability. The invention is not howeverlimited to these applications.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

A wireless communication unit usually forms part of a wirelesscommunication system. The wireless communication unit communicatesthrough a wireless communication network, which also forms part of thewireless communication system.

The wireless communication network normally comprises a network of basestations. Each base station enables communication within an areareferred to as a cell-site. Each cell-site may comprise multiplesectors. There are usually three sectors in a cell-site, each served bya dedicated antenna.

In some countries, it is a legal requirement that wireless communicationsystems be able to provide accurate information about the location ofwireless communication units. This information may serve, for example,to expedite the arrival of assistance to a user of a wirelesscommunication unit who calls the emergency services, using the ‘911’number in the United States.

Information about the location of a wireless communication unit can bederived in many ways. At any particular time, various forms ofmeasurement information may be available from:

(i) The wireless communication unit;

(ii) The wireless communication network, and particularly from one ormore base stations with which the wireless communication unit iscommunicating; or

(iii) Both of (i) and (ii).

This measurement information can be processed to provide an estimate ofthe location of the wireless mobile communication unit.

Considering the measurement information in more detail, this informationmay be available either:

(i) Directly. This means that the information is included in themeasurement made. The measurement may be made either by the wirelesscommunication unit, or by another part of the wireless communicationsystem, such as the wireless network.

(ii) Indirectly. This means that the information is derived from themeasurements made. An example would be an estimate of the distancebetween a wireless communication unit and the base station of a wirelesscommunication system. Such an estimate might be calculated bymultiplying the speed of propagation of the signal by a measured timedifference between transmission and receipt of a signal.

So some or all of the following mobile measurement information may beavailable:

(i) The absolute distance(s) from the wireless communication unit to oneor more network sectors.

(ii) Differential distances between the wireless communication unit andone or more pairs of network sectors.

(iii) Received signal powers recorded by the wireless communicationsunit from one or more network sectors.

(iv) Received signal-to-noise ratio measurements recorded by thewireless communication unit from one or more network sectors.

In addition, the following network information may be available:

(i) Antenna locations per sector. This information may be provided inlatitude and longitude, or as ‘Easting’ and ‘Northing’ directions, orthe equivalent.

(ii) Antenna properties. This information may include height aboveground, azimuth, tilt, horizontal and vertical beam pattern, transmittedpower levels for control and traffic channels.

A combination of the mobile measurement information and the networkinformation is often used to provide geometric interpretations of themobile device location.

So prior art geo-location methods have as their inputs various forms ofdirectly- and indirectly derived measurement information. Thatmeasurement information may have come from the wireless communicationunit, the wireless communication system, or both. Some wirelesscommunication units may be able to provide further information thatoriginates from direct communication links between the wirelesscommunication unit and other wireless communication units. Such directcommunication links do not pass through the wireless communicationnetwork.

FIG. 1 shows a simple example of a wireless communication system 100.Wireless communication unit 110 communicates with base station 120. Basestation 120 is one of many base stations that together comprise thewireless communication system 100. Base station 120 is the nearest basestation to wireless communication unit 110, and is located a distance‘R’ from wireless communication unit 110.

FIG. 1 shows one problem with prior art geo-location methods. If thebase station 120 has an omni-directional antenna, and no othermeasurement information is available, then any attempt to provide asingle estimate of the location of the wireless communication unit 110is very difficult. The information available from the wirelesscommunication unit 110 and/or from base station 120 allows prior artgeo-location methods to calculate only the absolute value of distance R.This distance is measured relative to the known location of base station120, which might be at coordinates (x_(B), y_(B)). However, all that isknown is that the wireless communication unit 110 is located somewhereon a circle of radius R, centred on (x_(B), y_(B)), which is the circle130 in FIG. 1.

The single estimate of the location would have to be a point chosen atrandom on the circle 130. The error in this estimate could be up to 2R,because the wireless communication unit might in fact be located oncircle 130 at a point diametrically opposite to the estimated location.

FIG. 2 considers another simple example of a wireless communicationsystem 200. FIG. 2 also shows a wireless communication unit 210 and basestation 220. Base station 220 has a directional antenna. It isstatistically most likely that wireless communication unit 220 is beingserved by the main lobe 230 of the directional antenna. So a singleestimate of the location of the wireless communication unit 210 can bemade with greater certainty than was the case with the wirelesscommunication system of FIG. 1. However, it is also possible, but lesslikely, that wireless communication unit 210 is being served by a‘side-lobe’ or ‘back-lobe’ of the directional antenna. A back-lobe isshown as reference 240 in FIG. 2.

A prior art geo-location method would provide an estimate of thelocation of wireless communication unit 210 based on the distance R andthe direction of the antenna's main lobe. This estimate is shown aspoint (x₁, y₁) on FIG. 2. However, the wireless communication unit 210might provide the same measurement information, such as a receivedsignal to noise ratio, if it were in fact being served by the back-lobe240 of the antenna. In this case, it would be located at a distance lessthan R from base station 220, in the opposite direction. Such a locationis shown as point (x₂, y₂) on FIG. 2, which is located 0.25R from basestation 220. If wireless communication unit 210 were in fact located atpoint (x₂, y₂), then the estimated location (x₁, y₁) would be in errorby a distance of 1.25R.

In general terms, prior art geo-location techniques usually deliver asingle point in space as their estimate of the location of the wirelessdevice. This point may, for example, be described by an x coordinate anda y coordinate, as in FIGS. 1 and 2. However, such an approach does notgive the user information about the reliability of the estimate of thelocation. Reliability, in this example, means both ‘accuracy’ and‘precision’.

‘Accuracy’ concerns whether the estimated location is the correct one,or not. In the example of FIG. 1, it was explained that the measurementof the location of mobile communication unit 110 might be inaccurate byas much as 2R.

‘Precision’ is the exactness of the measurement. Both FIGS. 1 and 2assumed that the distance R could be determined very precisely, i.e.that an exact value for R could be derived.

Both accuracy and precision depend on the type and quality of data onwhich the measurement estimate is based.

Whereas FIGS. 1 and 2 assumed that distance R could be determinedreliably, there is in fact an error range associated with themeasurement of R itself. The measurement of R is in fact imprecise.

FIG. 3 illustrates the imprecision in the measurement of R. FIG. 3corresponds generally to the arrangement of FIG. 1. A base station 320located at point (X_(B), Y_(B)) might measure the distance to acommunication unit 310 as R. Circle 330 shows the locus of all points atthe distance R, which is the distance from base station 320 at which themobile is most likely to be located. Due to the measurement collectionprocess, however, the user 310 might actually be at a distance ofbetween (R−e1) and (R+e2) from base station 320. So it is not possibleeven to say with certainty that the user 310 lies on circle 330.

An error function describes the probability that communication unit 310is located at each particular distance from base station 320. The errorfunction is usually complex. The details of the error function can bedetermined through a variety of means. One option is to place calls froma small number of locations, and compare the measurement data with theknown locations.

Summing up the discussion of FIGS. 1-3, there is both inaccuracy andimprecision in the measurement of the location of a mobilecommunications unit. So some degree of error is likely in themeasurement of the position of a mobile communications unit in mostcellular communications systems.

These problems are greatest in the unusual case of:

(i) A base station with an omni-directional antenna, such as in FIG. 1;and

(ii) When received signal strength is the only measurement data on whichan estimate of the position of the mobile communications unit can bemade.

In the preceding discussion and the discussion that follows, the term‘communicating’ includes a variety of forms of communication. Theseforms include, but are not limited to, speech or data communicationsessions on traffic channels, and communication on the control channel.So, for example, the communication may not require the user of a mobiletelephone to actually place or receive a call. The communication mayinvolve, for example, only the intermittent receipt by a mobiletelephone of data over the wireless communication system's controlchannel.

Prior art U.S. Pat. No. 5,293,642 (Lo) describes a variety of approachesto estimating the location of a mobile communication unit. Theapproaches involve calculating a probability density function for thelocation of the mobile communication unit. A mobile station may be incommunication with two or more base stations. In this case, severalprobability density functions can be calculated, each describing thelocation of the mobile calculated from measurements received from one ofthe base stations. These probability density functions may be combined,to provide a joint probability density function. U.S. Pat. No. 5,293,642(Lo) may employ any of the following data in calculating a locationprobability density function:

Radio attenuation from RSSI measurements at the mobile station;

Radio attenuation from RSSI measurements at the base stations;

Direction of signal arrival at the base station;

Radio propagation delay from mobile signal arriving at the base station;and

Mobile transmission timing alignment.

Prior art United States patent application US2008080429 (Hart) describesa process of minimum variance location estimation in wireless networks.A probability density function is calculated, and a ‘probabilitysurface’ is derived from the probability density function. A meanlocation of a wireless node is calculated from the probability surface.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with a first aspect of the present invention, there isprovided a method for geo-location of a wireless communication unit inaccordance with the description herein.

In accordance with a second aspect of the present invention, there isprovided a wireless communication unit or a wireless communicationsystem in accordance with the description herein.

In accordance with a third aspect of the present invention, there isprovided a method of selecting enhancements to a wireless communicationsystem in accordance with the description herein.

In accordance with a fourth aspect of the present invention, there isprovided a computer program product in accordance with the descriptionherein.

In accordance with a fifth aspect of the present invention, there isprovided a wireless communication system in accordance with thedescription herein.

The geo-location method of the invention provides information, as partof its output, about more than one possible location for a wirelesscommunication unit. The method therefore may retain more of theinformation associated with the measurements on which the locationestimates are based than was the case with prior art geo-locationmethods, and use this information in its output. The output from themethod of the present invention may provide information about second andthird, etc., most likely locations for a device, and/or may keepuncertainty information and present this as part of the output.

The invention may, for example, indicate that there are two possiblelocations for a wireless communication unit, and that one of the twolocations has only a slightly higher probability of being correct thanthe other. The user of a mobile communication unit, or the operator of awireless communication system, may react very differently to thisinformation than would be the case with information from a prior artgeo-location method.

The present invention may therefore offer a number of advantages, forexample in:

(i) Providing ‘real-time’ information to a user of a wirelesscommunication unit about that user's current location; or

(ii) Searching for a user of a wireless communication unit who hasrequested emergency assistance.

The geo-location information provided by the present invention may alsobe used in ‘post-processing’. Such processing may be carried out by,amongst others, the following:

(i) operators of wireless communication networks when analysingtelecommunications traffic patterns;

(ii) the emergency services;

(iii) general location based services;

(iv) organisations that monitor levels and speeds of vehicular roadtraffic by tracking ‘anonymised’ mobile phone signals, for example tomeasure or forecast road traffic delays.

The results of such post-processing are themselves used in decisionmaking. Such decisions include decisions about enhancing networks, forexample by adding new base stations, or upgrading an antenna in anetwork sector. The method of selecting enhancements to a wirelesscommunication system in accordance with the invention shows advantagesover prior art arrangements, and may result in more effective upgradesto the network being made, when they are needed.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Exemplary embodiments of the present invention will now be explainedwith reference to the accompanying drawings.

FIGS. 1-3 show wireless communication systems, and illustrate thelimitations of prior art geo-location methods.

FIG. 4 shows an exemplary embodiment of a wireless communications systemin accordance with the invention.

FIG. 5 shows an exemplary embodiment of a method of geo-location inaccordance with the invention.

FIG. 6 shows a flowchart for a method for geo-location of a wirelesscommunication unit in accordance with the invention.

FIG. 7 shows a flowchart for a method of selecting enhancements to awireless communication system in accordance with the invention.

DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

FIG. 4 shows an exemplary embodiment of a wireless communications system400 in accordance with the invention.

Wireless communication unit 410 is connectable via a wirelesscommunication link 420 to a wireless communication network 430 ofwireless communication system 400. Base stations 432 and 434, andcontrol unit 436 all form part of wireless communication network 430.

Communication link 420 may comprise a voice communication channel, or adata link.

In accordance with this exemplary embodiment of the invention, aprobability density function is derived for the location of the wirelesscommunication unit. The probability density function is derived from atleast one of the group of:

(i) measurement information from the wireless communication unit 410;

(ii) network information about the wireless communication network 430.

The probability density function may be derived by one of several of thecomponents of the wireless communication system 400. For example, aprocessor 438 located in control unit 436 may derive the probabilitydensity function.

The probability density function is sampled, to provide outputinformation. This output information comprises both spatial informationand probability information about each of at least two possiblelocations for the wireless communication unit 410. Sampling of theprobability density function may also occur in processor 438.

In an alternative arrangement, the probability density function may bederived in a separate system, which is not shown on FIG. 4. Such aseparate system is particularly likely to be used when the probabilitydensity function is derived as part of ‘post-processing’, which does nottake place in real time. Such post-processing may be carried out in adedicated system outside of wireless communication system 400, usingrecords of one or more communication links or calls. In someapplications, the post-processing will be applied to several records, orto a large number of records. Here the ‘large number’ may include manythousands or millions of call records. When the invention is performedby a separate system, one or more computer workstations may be used.These workstations may be dedicated to this task, which would be theusual approach. Alternatively, these workstations may perform othertasks, such as fault management or compiling switch statistics andmaintenance reports, in addition to the present invention. Theseworkstations may consist of general-purpose computers. However, theycould also be composed of custom hardware, with specially-builtprinted-wiring cards & custom chips to accelerate the necessarycalculations. Where all calls in a busy network are analysed, such acustom type arrangement may provide greater speed of implementation ofthe method.

One approach to implementing the invention would be simply to arrangefor each of a group of mobiles of a mobile telephone system to providedata as an ‘input’. The mobile telephones would provide theirmeasurements to the Radio Access Network (RAN) of the mobile telephonesystem, which in turn provides the mobile measurements to the OperationsSupport System (OSS) of the mobile telephone system. The calculationsnecessary to perform the invention would be carried out in theOperations Support System (OSS). The Operations Support System of amobile telephone system is normally connected directly to the RadioAccess Network (RAN), so it is easy to arrange for the OperationsSupport System to receive measurements from the Radio Access Network.

The probability density function may be derived from at least twoindividual probability density functions, each individual probabilitydensity function being based on either:

(i) the measurement information from the wireless communication unit410; or

(ii) the network information about the wireless communication network430.

Various techniques are available for calculating probability densityfunctions. However, in accordance with the invention, the probabilitydensity function, or the two or more individual probability densityfunctions, may be created by parametric modelling. The parametricmodelling may use one or more moments of a random variable distribution.The probability density function thus created will be such that thesummation of the probabilities of all possible locations equals unity.

The spatial information and probability information about each of the atleast two possible locations for the wireless communication unit mayadvantageously comprise:

(i) an x-coordinate and a y-coordinate for each possible location; and(ii) a probability of the wireless communication unit 410 being locatedat the x-coordinate and y-coordinate, the probability being derived fromthe probability density function.

In order to make the output information from the invention moreuser-friendly, the possible locations for the mobile communication unit410 with a probability less than a threshold value may be eliminated.This can be done, for example, using importance sampling. The outputinformation would then comprise a list of all the possible locations forthe wireless communication unit 410 with a probability greater than orequal to the threshold value. The user of the wireless communicationunit 410 may be able to select how many possible locations for thewireless communications unit are included in the output information.

The output information of the invention may serve a wide variety ofuses. However, the output information may be displayed on a screen ofthe wireless communication unit 410. In an alternative arrangement tothat described above, it is also possible for the wireless informationunit 410 to calculate the probability density function, rather than thisbeing a function of the wireless communication network 430.

The invention may be arranged to operate with measurement informationfrom the wireless communication unit 410 that comprises one or more ofthe following:

(i) one or more absolute distances from the wireless communication unit410 to one or more network sectors of the wireless communication network430;

(ii) one or more differential distances between the wirelesscommunication unit 410 and one or more pairs of network sectors of thewireless communication network 430;

(iii) one or more received signal powers recorded by the wirelesscommunication unit 410 from one or more network sectors of the wirelesscommunication network 430; and

(iv) one or more measurements of the received signal-to-noise ratiorecorded by the wireless communication unit 410 from one or more networksectors of the wireless communication network 430.

In addition, the invention may be arranged to operate with networkinformation about the wireless communication network 430 that comprisesone or more of the following:

(i) antenna or base station location information;

(ii) antenna properties;

(iii) azimuthal and tilt pointing angles of a sector antenna;

(iv) transmitted power levels.

FIG. 5 shows an exemplary embodiment of a method of geo-location inaccordance with the invention.

FIG. 5 shows first and second antennae 532, 534, which are part of twobase stations such as base stations 432 and 434 of FIG. 4. First andsecond antennae 532, 534 are sectorised antennae. First antenna 532 islocated in a first sector, and second antenna 534 is located in a secondsector.

Each of first and second antennae 532 and 534 focuses its transmittedenergy. This focussing is such that most of the energy falls within acertain range of angles of azimuthal beam width. The range might be,typically, 45 to 90 degrees, centred about the azimuthal pointing angle.The direction of each of the arrows 532, 534 in FIG. 5 shows theazimuthal pointing angle for that antenna.

Assume now that a wireless communications unit, such as unit 410 shownin FIG. 4, performs a first measurement, which is of the distance tofirst antenna 532. The first measurement may be either a direct or anindirect measurement. FIG. 5 has been provided to illustrate theprobability information that is available from a wireless communicationsunit whose location is uncertain, so no wireless communications unit isactually shown on FIG. 5.

The first measurement results in a first probability density function.The solid double circle 540 illustrates the probability information,which is derived from the first probability density function. Firstantenna 532 lies at the centre of both of the circles 540. The doublecircle 540 corresponds to two contours of equal probability of findingthe wireless communications unit. This measurement is generally similarto that described in connection with FIG. 3. The two lines of doublecircle 540 may, for example, correspond to distances R+e and R−e in FIG.3.

The mobile communications unit is also able to perform a secondmeasurement, which is of the distance to the second antenna 534 in FIG.5. However, the second measurement yields a differential distancemeasure, relative to the first sector that contains first antenna 532.The differential distance measure might be obtained from the TimeDifference of Arrival, the ‘TDOA’, of communication signals. The secondmeasurement provides a second probability density function. The fourdotted lines generally indicated by reference 550 in FIG. 5 illustrateprobability information, which is derived from the second probabilitydistribution function. The four dotted lines are contours of equalprobability, and each takes the form of a hyperbola. The geometricalparameters of the hyperbola depend on the locations of the first andsecond sectors, and the differential distance quantity.

Both double circle 540 and the four hyperbolae 550 are in fact a densesampling of points from their respective probability density functions.

In order to locate the wireless communication unit, it is necessary tocombine the first and second probability density functions. This isbecause the probability of the wireless communication unit being at aparticular location is the conjunction of independent events, i.e.:

(i) The mobile communication unit being located a distance from antenna532 corresponding to approximately the radius of one of the circles 540;

(ii) A Time Difference of Arrival of a given value; and

(iii) Mobile visibility of the first and second sectors.

The first and second probability density functions need to be suitablyscaled when making this combination.

The example of FIG. 5 shows directional antennae in each sector. In thiscase, the most precise information is derivable by combining the firstand second probability density functions with the probability densityfunctions associated with the antennae. This is because users are morelikely to be served in the main lobe of each antenna than either in theback lobe, or in a side lobe of the antenna. If both first and secondantennae had been identical omnidirectional antennae, there would be noneed to include their probability density functions in the combination.

The possible locations for the wireless communications unit are in firstand second ovals 560 and 570. These show the locations where thecombined probability density functions lead to the highest probabilityvalues.

In prior art geo-location approaches, the usual output would be a singlepoint towards the centre of first oval 560. The point would be in firstoval 560, because of the pointing angles of the antennae. Providing onlythe single point in first oval 560 as an output would discard usefulinformation about the geo-location process, and limit its utility. Forexample, the probability of being at each possible location in secondoval 570 might be nearly equal to the probability of being incorresponding points in upper oval 560, but that information would bediscarded by prior art approaches.

When the emergency services locate a user, for example, it is valuablefor them to know if there is more than one very likely location thatrequires their attention. The present invention provides thatinformation. The prior art method would not.

The invention therefore provides a method for geo-location of a wirelesscommunication unit 410. The steps of the method are summarised in theflowchart 600 of appended FIG. 6. In step 610, the wirelesscommunication unit 410 communicates with the wireless communicationnetwork 430. In step 620, a probability density function is derived frommeasurement and/or network information. In step 630, the probabilitydensity function is sampled, to provide spatial and probabilityinformation about at least two possible locations for a wirelesscommunication unit 410.

The invention also provides a method of selecting enhancements to awireless communication system 400. An exemplary method in accordancewith the invention is shown in flowchart 700 of FIG. 7.

Step 710 of the method of the invention comprises deriving a probabilitydensity function for a location of a wireless communication unit 410,from at least one of the group of:

(i) measurement information from the wireless communication unit 410;

(ii) network information about the wireless communication network 430.

Step 720 comprises sampling the probability density function to provideoutput information, the output information comprising spatialinformation and probability information about the location of thewireless communication unit 410.

Step 730 comprises deriving a quality rating for the wirelesscommunication link between the wireless communication unit 410 and thewireless communication network 430.

Step 740 comprises using the output information and the quality ratingin a decision on enhancements to the wireless communication system 400.

The decision in step 740 on enhancements to the wireless communicationsystem 400 may employ output information and quality ratings derivedfrom many wireless communication units 410 and/or many wirelesscommunication links. Generally, output information or quality ratingsderived from larger numbers of units or links will lead to betterdecisions.

The decision in step 740 on enhancements to the wireless communicationsystem 400 may comprise at least one from the group of:

(i) Deciding to re-direct an antenna in a base station 432, 434 of thewireless communication network 430;

(ii) Deciding to upgrade an antenna in a base station 432, 434 of thewireless communication network 430;

(iii) Deciding to change the transmission power level of an antenna in abase station 432, 434 of the wireless communication network 430.

Alternatively, or in addition, the decision 740 on enhancements to thewireless communication system 400 may comprise at least one from thegroup of:

(i) Choosing a site for an additional base station in the wirelesscommunication network;

(ii) Re-locating an existing base station 432, 434 to a new site; or

(iii) Moving a mobile or temporary base station.

The quality rating may be derived from at least one from the group of

-   -   (i) Data about the number of times when it was not possible to        establish a communication link 420, and/or data about the number        of times that the communication link 420 breaks;

(ii) Data about the number of times when it was not possible to place acall and/or data about the rate of calls being dropped during the call;

(iii) One or more received signal powers recorded by the wirelesscommunication unit 410 from network sectors of the wirelesscommunication network 420;

(iv) One or more measurements of the received signal-to-noise ratiorecorded by the wireless communication unit 410 from network sectors ofthe wireless communication network.

It will be appreciated that, for clarity purposes, the above descriptionhas described embodiments of the invention with reference to differentfunctional units. Hence, references to specific functional units areonly to be seen as references to suitable means for providing thedescribed functionality, rather than indicative of a strict logical orphysical structure or organization.

Aspects of the invention may be implemented in any suitable formincluding hardware, software, firmware or any combination of these.Aspects of the invention may optionally be implemented, at least partly,as computer software running on one or more data processors and/ordigital signal processors. Thus, the elements and objects of anembodiment of the invention may be physically, functionally andlogically implemented in any suitable way. Indeed, the functionality maybe implemented in a single unit, in a plurality of units or as part ofother functional units.

Although the invention has been described in connection with someembodiments, it is not intended to be limited to the specific form setforth herein. Rather, the scope of the present invention is limited onlyby the claims. Additionally, although a feature may appear to bedescribed in connection with particular embodiments, one skilled in theart would recognize that various features of the described embodimentsmay be combined in accordance with embodiments of the invention.

Additionally, although individual features may be included in differentclaims, these may possibly be advantageously combined, and the inclusionin different claims does not imply that a combination of features is notfeasible and/or advantageous. Also, the inclusion of a feature in onecategory of claim does not imply a limitation to this category, butrather the feature may be equally applicable to other claim categories,as appropriate.

The order of individual steps in a method claim does not imply that thesteps must be performed in this order. Rather, the steps may beperformed in any suitable order. In addition, singular references do notexclude a plurality. Thus, references to ‘a’, ‘an’, ‘first’, ‘second’,etc. do not preclude a plurality.

1-17. (canceled)
 18. A method comprising: determining a probabilitydensity function, for a location of a wireless communication unit, fromat least one of: measurement information from the wireless communicationunit, the wireless communication unit being connected via a wirelesscommunication link to a wireless communication network, or networkinformation associated with the wireless communication network; samplingthe probability density function to provide output information, theoutput information comprising spatial information and probabilityinformation associated with the location of the wireless communicationunit; determining a quality rating for the wireless communication linkbetween the wireless communication unit and the wireless communicationnetwork; and applying the output information and the quality rating in adecision on a plurality of enhancements to a wireless communicationsystem, the wireless communication system comprising the wirelesscommunication unit and the wireless communication network.
 19. Themethod of claim 18, where applying the output information and thequality rating comprises: applying the output information and thequality rating from at least one of the wireless communication unit orthe wireless communication link in the decision on the plurality ofenhancements to the wireless communication system.
 20. The method ofclaim 18, where the decision on the plurality of enhancements to thewireless communication system comprises: deciding to re-direct anantenna in a base station of the wireless communication network;deciding to upgrade the antenna in the base station of the wirelesscommunication network; or deciding to change a transmission power levelof the antenna in the base station of the wireless communicationnetwork.
 21. The method of claim 18, where the decision on the pluralityof enhancements to the wireless communication system comprises at leastone of: choosing a site for an additional base station in the wirelesscommunication network; re-locating an existing base station to a newsite; or moving a mobile or temporary base station.
 22. The method ofclaim 18, where determining the quality rating is based on: informationidentifying a quantity of times when establishing a communication linkwas not possible; information identifying a quantity of times that thecommunication link breaks; information identifying a quantity of timeswhen placing a call was not possible; information identifying a rate ofcalls being dropped; one or more received signal powers recorded by thewireless communication unit from a plurality of network sectors of thewireless communication network; or one or more measurements of receivedsignal-to-noise ratios recorded by the wireless communication unit fromnetwork sectors of the wireless communication network.
 23. The method ofclaim 18, where the method is to be performed on the wirelesscommunication unit.
 24. A wireless communication system, comprising: oneor more processors to: derive a probability density function, for alocation of a wireless communication unit, from at least one of:measurement information from the wireless communication unit, thewireless communication unit being connected via a wireless communicationlink to a wireless communication network, or network informationassociated with the wireless communication network; sample theprobability density function to provide output information, the outputinformation comprising spatial information and probability informationassociated with the location of the wireless communication unit; rate aquality of the wireless communication link between the wirelesscommunication unit and the wireless communication network; provide aquality rating based on the quality of the wireless communication link;and select a plurality of enhancements to the wireless communicationsystem based on the output information and the quality rating, thewireless communication system comprising the wireless communication unitand the wireless communication network.
 25. The wireless communicationsystem of claim 24, where the one or more processors, when selecting theplurality of enhancements to the wireless communication system, are to:select the plurality of enhancements to the wireless communicationsystem based on the output information and the quality rating from thewireless communication unit and the wireless communication link.
 26. Thewireless communication system of claim 24, where the one or moreprocessors, when selecting the plurality of enhancements to the wirelesscommunication system, are to: decide to re-direct an antenna in a basestation of the wireless communication network.
 27. The wirelesscommunication system of claim 24, where the one or more processors, whenselecting the plurality of enhancements to the wireless communicationsystem, are to: decide to upgrade an antenna in a base station of thewireless communication network.
 28. The wireless communication system ofclaim 24, where the one or more processors, when selecting the pluralityof enhancements to the wireless communication system, are to: decide tochange a transmission power level of an antenna in a base station of thewireless communication network.
 29. The wireless communication system ofclaim 24, where the one or more processors, when rating the quality ofthe wireless communication link, are to: rate the quality of thewireless communication link based on information associated with aquantity of times when establishing a communication link was notpossible and a quantity of times that the communication link breaks. 30.The wireless communication system of claim 24, where the one or moreprocessors, when rating the quality of the wireless communication link,are to: rate the quality of the wireless communication link based oninformation associated with a quantity of times when placing a call wasnot possible and a rate of calls being dropped.
 31. A non-transitorycomputer-readable medium storing instructions, the instructionscomprising: one or more instructions that, when executed by one or moreprocessors, cause the one or more processors to: determine a probabilitydensity function, for a location of a wireless communication unit, fromat least one of: measurement information from the wireless communicationunit, the wireless communication unit being connected via a wirelesscommunication link to a wireless communication network, or networkinformation associated with the wireless communication network; samplethe probability density function to provide output information, theoutput information comprising spatial information and probabilityinformation associated with the location of the wireless communicationunit; rate a quality of the wireless communication link between thewireless communication unit and the wireless communication network;provide a quality rating based on the quality of the wirelesscommunication link; and apply one or more enhancements to a wirelesscommunication system based on the output information and the qualityrating, the wireless communication system comprising the wirelesscommunication unit and/or the wireless communication network.
 32. Thenon-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 31, where the one ormore instructions, that cause the one or more processors to apply of theone or more enhancements to the wireless communication system, cause theone or more processors to: choose a site for an additional base stationin the wireless communication network.
 33. The non-transitorycomputer-readable medium of claim 31, where the one or moreinstructions, that cause the one or more processors to apply the one ormore enhancements to the wireless communication system, cause the one ormore processors to: re-locate an existing base station to a new site.34. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 31, where theone or more instructions, that cause the one or more processors to applyof the one or more enhancements to the wireless communication system,cause the one or more processors to: move a mobile or temporary basestation.
 35. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 31,where the one or more instructions, that cause the one or moreprocessors to rate the quality of the wireless communication link, causethe one or more processors to: rate the quality of the wirelesscommunication link based on one or more received signal powers recordedby the wireless communication unit from a plurality of network sectorsof the wireless communication network.
 36. The non-transitorycomputer-readable medium of claim 31, where the one or moreinstructions, that cause the one or more processors to rate the qualityof the wireless communication link, cause the one or more processors to:rate the quality of the wireless communication link based on one or moremeasurements of received signal-to-noise ratios recorded by the wirelesscommunication unit from a plurality of network sectors of the wirelesscommunication network.
 37. The non-transitory computer-readable mediumof claim 31, where the one or more instructions are to be performed onthe wireless communication unit.